| 1 |
On 01/18/2013 09:28 AM, Benedikt Böhm wrote: |
| 2 |
> i've refrained from doing unattended upgrades for a long time, but i'm |
| 3 |
> quite confident in updateworld these days and i usually test it on 2-3 |
| 4 |
> machines and then let the other 50+ machines do it unattended and it has |
| 5 |
> been working fine so far ... |
| 6 |
good strategy. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> but - and that's quite important i guess - i only use my own clone of |
| 9 |
> the portage tree which i sync from time to time and i also keep |
| 10 |
> different versions stable, etc. |
| 11 |
HEAVY USER! But you have full control. |
| 12 |
Do you have any sophisticated mechanism to detect tree breakage (i.e. us |
| 13 |
f*** up), like Samuli replying -commit to -dev or irc activity? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Or do you simply delay commit? (re-schedule on weekends/nights) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Delaying stabilization seems legit, but on Gentoo-stable ?! |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Michael Weber |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
web: https://xmw.de/ |
| 23 |
mailto: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> |
Archives