Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council 201006 elections
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:47:12
Message-Id: 4C0644A0.1090804@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council 201006 elections by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 02-06-2010 08:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 > On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 04:11:26 Torsten Veller wrote:
6 >> * Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>:
7 >>> On Monday, May 31, 2010 22:46:50 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
8 >>>> Here are the details for the Council 201006 elections:
9 >>>> * nominations: June 5th to 18th
10 >>>> * voting: June 20th to July 3rd
11 >>>
12 >>> funny, this isnt what the council page says at all
13 >>>
14 >> | Nominations are allowed from July 1st 0000 UTC to July 31st 2359 UTC
15 >> | Voting is opened from August 1st 0000 UTC to August 31st 2359 UTC
16 >> |
17 >> | (from <http://council.gentoo.org>)
18 >>
19 >> The dates shifted because a former council didn't made its full term
20 >> due to the 50% attendance clause. "The 'one year' is then reset from
21 >> that point." [0]
22 >
23 > yes, that is fairly obvious, but my point was to highlight the existence of
24 > discrepancies rather than their background
25 >
26 >> The length of the periods were shortened in 2008 [1] when we had the
27 >> early election and last year's election was run within 2+2 weeks too.
28 >
29 > as that e-mail notes, the shortened period was due to the forced re-run and
30 > getting back on track quickly rather than making it the norm. personally i
31 > dont see what's wrong with running a full month considering the weight of the
32 > positions.
33
34 Mike,
35
36 ever since we started the 2 + 2 weeks elections, no one has complained
37 to the election officials about the shortened period. Furthermore, the
38 officials started tracking the ballots evolution and in the last 2 years
39 or so, the majority of votes were casted in the first days of an
40 election, followed by a week or so with hardly any votes and a small
41 number of votes casted just before the election was closed.
42 As a member of the elections team and an election official for most
43 (all?) of the elections in the past 3 years, I think that returning to
44 the 1 + 1 month election would be a waste of time.
45
46
47 > -mike
48
49 - --
50 Regards,
51
52 Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
53 Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections
54 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
55 Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
56 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
57
58 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMBkSgAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPWgAQAMvVsprQAWb85d+KhVPS3lE0
59 3WvJ+06eeOWbLln/6+9wjGp7Z2ta7+r6ZUbjJTMSj4A7wxRRb/00bbjqfEdetOwr
60 KXwYP3I4+Cz6tQ3DzgOVCbTM41YSM0gsnsnmNWM8oPGI4wMg0+t2OiZxm2TM510/
61 QDinuLqlE86g+ImAGAK+lUgAtSWd/AIYf3klziVwJSHmDYkW1YlLzA441IWIxHGd
62 nB1Ui9Lk7g3IRVPrCVZ3UkdPGGO0SvndRrEIC35lIF61qhIHNiYgldcRz+oBEm7a
63 mgdPi6svXn8H5o/mwhCw4nk/SH6MbmaAMOfokAcDQTyeZwtLYMqzHQvzQoWnZ81/
64 8Db5IYinfVf15MPX14p0FGW5D1sss0aIPXCMyE533rC+VA0kM4o83HexQqMI5TBa
65 crKGT91w0/gR1WptvjPKFjG1g1gyniw7NbT7rDg4/c/lyYLgC1NsjBDQd6koP9lf
66 8qkSAtuYYDnIcnVUCtXWPruassG96IUC0oqIb/WCX3Vpy/dx5CFmzgjj1Vs2xbY9
67 EyMmyUU4VYI9LUyQVcYD4ouECS5HcmbBt1eCrvsQZTn5gv6hB2nt7ofSRoah0Bka
68 eiimKmuZnTkM7n6gn/DFoPVac+i8AdEbhxDpWYF0uRMz0c0YXYqW20jTFv/p1WX4
69 6MbQ/5rYBLfqHin7+Z6+
70 =Tx1l
71 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council 201006 elections Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>