| 1 |
On 2013-03-31, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:45:50PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Those 70-* and 80-* are in udev pkg_postinst, this news item, |
| 5 |
>> everywhere... can all 3 be deleted if you haven't modified them yourself. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> So that leaves one... local.rules... dunno about that. I'm curious. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> One paragraph you should add to the news item is... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>======================================================================= |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Users who change interface names will need to search, as root, for |
| 14 |
> references to eth[0-9] in their config files. Then they will have to |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
"references to *their network devices* in their config files. [...]" |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
And maybe provide something like |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
"If you want a quick way to generate a list of network devices affected |
| 21 |
by udev persistency rules, run: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
grep -o 'NAME="[^"]*"' /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules" |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
although I don't know for sure how reliable is this in other |
| 26 |
systems/shells. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> change the config files to reflect the new names. At least the |
| 30 |
> following search is suggested... |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> grep -rl eth[0-9] /etc /var/lib |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Also any custom firewall/routing/network scripts in other locations |
| 35 |
> should be searched for references to eth[0-9]. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
>======================================================================= |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Nuno Silva (aka njsg) |
| 43 |
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/ |
Archives