Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 03:21:52
Message-Id: CAEdQ38GGOhAOxznpTW1w_YHdCvLv72yD7kTrChQEZUgFVAN9Kw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum by Mike Pagano
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:12 AM Mike Pagano <mpagano@g.o> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 06:46:43PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > On Thursday, 13 February 2020 5:40:46 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:59 AM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:54:19PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > > > > On Monday, 10 February 2020 7:55:01 AM AEDT Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > > > > > > Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 > > > > > > > lines of > > > > > > > Manifest?! > > > > > > > > > > > > Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments > > > > > > everywhere, all the time and just get irritated for no benefit to > > > > > > Gentoo? > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps I'm the one being ignorant here, but why are we lambasting > > > > > someone for seeking clarification about an unusual inclusion on a > > > > > review thread?> > > > > I wasn't going to say anything, but I can't let this go by without > > > > commenting. > > > > > > > > Sam is correct. Maybe the tone is a bit off, (and that is debatable), > > > > but this definitely can be seen as a legit question, regardless of other > > > > things Michael has posted. > > > > > > Unfortunately it's not about a single issue or email. It's a > > > consistent pattern that multiple people have asked him to rein in over > > > a long period. :( > > > > Without going into specifics, veremit and I have certainly had our 'differences > > of opinion' in the past; but I don't believe this is one of those occasions. > > > > Calling out bad actors (not saying veremit is one, I just mean in the general > > sense) is an unfortunate but important task, but call them out on bad > > behaviour, not for what appears to be an impassioned but otherwise > > unremarkable query. > > > > I agree with this 100 percent. Not judging solely on the content of the > specific email in the thread does not allow people to grow and improve. Are we > all to be judged on our past behavior forever with no chance to overcome past > transgressions ?
That's not what's going on.

Replies