Archives
Archives
| From: | Scott Ellis <scotte@××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. | ||
| Date: | Sun, 02 Jan 2022 00:03:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJ7Ptmy718yLaCN5FDGnh8EVwS5Cj23JC4yZCL=zCOcZ9PjuYg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. by Piotr Karbowski |
||
| 1 | Your `ipv6` USE flag hits home - I don't use IPv6, nor do I want to have |
| 2 | IPv6 support built into things (just another potential "thing" that I have |
| 3 | to secure, or errors/warnings I need to suppress since I run an IPv6-less |
| 4 | kernel). |
| 5 | |
| 6 | If there needs to be a path to culling USE flags, perhaps looking to which |
| 7 | flags actually cause packages to pull in additional dependencies (vs solely |
| 8 | enable/disable a feature) would be a better place to start? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ScottE |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. | Sam James <sam@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. | Piotr Karbowski <slashbeast@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. | "Arsen Arsenović" <arsen@××××××.me> |