1 |
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 00:47 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'm considering masking wolk-sources and removing it from the tree. Do any |
5 |
> people still have a good reason to use wolk-sources? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> wolk-sources is a heavily patched Linux 2.4 kernel which lacks upstream |
8 |
> maintenance - the newest version being based on Linux 2.4.20. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Any objections? |
11 |
|
12 |
I was actually just thinking about WOLK today and how I never got around |
13 |
to putting the newest builds in the tree. For now keep them in there. |
14 |
I'll email upstream to see if whats the status on development for WOLK |
15 |
these days. The mailing lists have been quiet for the most part, so |
16 |
we'll see. It may be based on 2.4.20 but its no where near to what |
17 |
2.4.20 is ;). Its closer to a 2.6 kernel by now with its latest |
18 |
versions. |
19 |
|
20 |
Infra currently decommissioned to the two boxes we were running WOLK on, |
21 |
so we don't currently have a need for it from that side of things. |
22 |
|
23 |
I'll report back when I find out whats going on! |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
27 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
28 |
|
29 |
--- |
30 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
31 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
32 |
|
33 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |