| 1 |
2010-03-19 10:23:31 Dale napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500 |
| 4 |
> > Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100 |
| 9 |
> >>> Ben de Groot<yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
> >>> |
| 11 |
> >>> |
| 12 |
> >>>> Because it is extremely useless to the great majority of users. |
| 13 |
> >>>> |
| 14 |
> >>>> |
| 15 |
> >>> Most packages in the tree are useless to the great majority of |
| 16 |
> >>> users. |
| 17 |
> >>> |
| 18 |
> >> Which is why most users don't install everything. I have about 1000 |
| 19 |
> >> packages installed here. The packages installed are either something |
| 20 |
> >> I use or a dependency of something I use. What exactly is this being |
| 21 |
> >> installed for again? If nothing depends on it, there is no need to |
| 22 |
> >> have it. |
| 23 |
> >> |
| 24 |
> > It's being installed because it's a dependency of something you use. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Replace Python with any other library and we wouldn't be having this |
| 27 |
> > discussion. |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> OK. Right now, as you type this, what package depends on python-3 and |
| 32 |
> won't work with python-2? Anything at all? If it is nothing, then why |
| 33 |
> install it? |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Since python-3 is not what the system is using, it's not getting used |
| 36 |
> even if it is installed. So as I mentioned in another reply, portage is |
| 37 |
> installing something and it is just sitting there doing nothing. What |
| 38 |
> is the point in that? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
I can add "python2" USE flag (enabled by default) to some versions of |
| 41 |
dev-lang/python. With USE="-python2", Python 2 will not be required and |
| 42 |
Python 3 will be set as main active version of Python. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives