| 1 |
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:19:25 +0200, Christian Faulhammer |
| 2 |
<fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Alex Legler <a3li@g.o>: |
| 7 |
> > RUBY_TARGETS contains a list of ruby implementations and versions to |
| 8 |
> > install a package for, like this: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Python has to do the same for 2.x and 3 versions...wouldn't it be |
| 11 |
> nice to have the same solution for both languages? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It might be nice, /eventually/. |
| 15 |
As far as I can see, the proposed Python solution is just a concept, |
| 16 |
where we already have near-beta eclasses that we *really* want to deploy |
| 17 |
this year as they block the unmasking of Ruby 1.9. |
| 18 |
Additionally, there are some really nasty things about the current |
| 19 |
ruby.eclass (prepall override) and incompatibilities with RubyGems that |
| 20 |
should be resolved rather sooner than later. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> V-Li |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
A3-Li |
Archives