| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> Daniel, |
| 3 |
> Comments? Incidentally, I think we need to amend the proposal to |
| 4 |
> permit guide-xml as well as ReST for those people who are comfortable w/ |
| 5 |
> guide-xml. (From a practical point of view, the management proposal |
| 6 |
> would have made a great GLEP, and I've added it as GLEP 4. If I can't |
| 7 |
> get the powers that be to use it, GLEPS are DOA.) All that said, I |
| 8 |
> don't know where GLEPs fall into the new management scheme; devrel, |
| 9 |
> perhaps? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm going to say that this issue should be delegated to Paul de Vrieze |
| 12 |
(metastructure) who will then be responsible to ensure that the GLEP issue |
| 13 |
does not get dropped by us managers and gets properly reviewed and |
| 14 |
integrated into the management structure in a timely fashion. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Paul's role is to ensure that the management is being responsive to the |
| 17 |
needs of the project, and that these kinds of proposals do not get lost or |
| 18 |
forgotten due to our busy schedules. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Best Regards, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Daniel Robbins |
| 24 |
Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux |
| 25 |
http://www.gentoo.org |
Archives