From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support | ||
Date: | Sun, 24 May 2009 17:28:45 | ||
Message-Id: | 20090524182836.71ca9b6a@snowcone | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support by Nirbheek Chauhan |
1 | On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:50:45 +0530 |
2 | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > Won't this just lead to dependency hell? With horrible dependencies |
4 | > between different overlays? |
5 | |
6 | It's primarily a user feature. It's not a good way of solving most |
7 | inter-repository dependency issues. |
8 | |
9 | -- |
10 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> |