Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: Jason Stubbs <jasonbstubbs@×××××××××××.com>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 15:54:17
Message-Id: 200310051554.13405.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree by Jason Stubbs
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Sunday 05 October 2003 02:47 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote:
5 > > I although don't suggest that -src
6 > > suffix, but an option to the emerge, which tells it to install this
7 > > software to package's SLOT="$P-src", from which I then could be looking
8 > > in $PORT_SRC_DIR/$P-src.
9 > Agreed here. An option to emerge is much more intuitive.
10 However, it prevents packages from DEPENDing on it. For example, if the
11 kernels were to ever use the genkernel thing, nvidia-kernel might DEPEND on
12 nvidia-kernel if it actually needed the source for it. I also don't think it
13 should automaticly provide the package it is the source for until the user
14 uses ebuild to install/merge it into the system.
15 >
16 > > Oh and the kernel packages that would compile the kernel should install
17 > > the kernel headers of the compiled kernel to
18 > > /usr/src/linux-`uname -r`/include/
19 > > so that any package that needs the real kernel headers can find them.
20 > Er, I'm pretty sure that the packages that need the source in
21 > /usr/src/linux need more than just the headers - but don't quote me on
22 > that!
23 I can't think of any valid reason they would need to do so, but I've never
24 done much of anything with the kernel.
25 - --
26 Luke-Jr
27 Developer, Gentoo Linux
28 http://www.gentoo.org/
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
31
32 iD8DBQE/gD6ZZl/BHdU+lYMRAo+mAJ48Zu/YNRmBBbiLQm4ou6L+2MiBGQCeL2uq
33 xNvWJzLh5tDwbA+utGXtwGY=
34 =4Ilp
35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
36
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies