| 1 |
On 2021-01-08 19:14, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> The one floppym suggested, i.e. the same as sent patch but with |
| 3 |
> the default staying on the current behavior. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Do I understand correctly? You are willing to accept my patch but with |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> ACCT_USER_ALLOW_EXISTING_USER_TO_BE_MODIFIED |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
defaulting to a non-zero value to keep current behavior? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
This would be an acceptable compromise for me like it would allow users |
| 12 |
like me at least to opt-out. I would still try to convince Gentoo to |
| 13 |
change the default later because I believe this is a bad default but of |
| 14 |
course I would accept any voting results on this implementation detail. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Regards, |
| 19 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 20 |
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |
Archives