1 |
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Dear Everyone, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Does anyone have root access to Linux systems on any of the following |
5 |
> architectures that is willing to help ZFS development? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Alpha |
8 |
> HPPA |
9 |
> IA-64 |
10 |
> MIPS/MIPS64 |
11 |
> PPC/PPC64 |
12 |
> SH |
13 |
> SPARC/SPARC64 |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I want to port ZFSOnLinux to all Gentoo Linux architectures this year. |
16 |
> The above architectures either are not currently supported or have not |
17 |
> been tested in a while. Most of them will require patching isa_defs.h, |
18 |
> which I am in a position to do. I am not distributing the patches |
19 |
> because I don't know if ZFS will build on those platforms. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> People willing (and able) to help should email me with their |
22 |
> architecture and distribution. Gentoo Linux is preferred, but not |
23 |
> required. No knowledge of programming is required. I will provide you |
24 |
> with instructions on how to build and test ZFS on your architecture. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Yours truly, |
27 |
> Richard Yao |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
I talked to ryao on IRC, but didn't seem to get my point across: |
31 |
|
32 |
(Almost?) no one runs Gentoo on any of these architectures for |
33 |
anything other than the novelty. There is zero point in maintaining |
34 |
ZFS on them, and it only stands to add load to the arch teams. |
35 |
|
36 |
These architectures operate on a |
37 |
we-only-keyword-things-necessary-or-users-ask-for policy. I don't |
38 |
think ZFS falls into either of these cases. |