| 1 |
Does this need a vote? It seems to me to be a proposal entirely |
| 2 |
contained within -desktop which doesn't need outside approval |
| 3 |
(necessarily) and therefore if the -desktop managers and devs like the |
| 4 |
idea it should be proceeded. That said I think this would be a huge |
| 5 |
benefit to all Gentoo desktop users and fully support it (although I am |
| 6 |
not part of the -desktop project) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Joshua Brindle |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Hi, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> This GLEP exists for a long time now, still it is not accepted. I will outline |
| 15 |
> the current status: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> * KDE 3.2 (x86) supports this specification |
| 18 |
> * GNOME 2.6 (~x86) support this specification |
| 19 |
> * domenu[12_] has to be included in portage to be used by the ebuilds to |
| 20 |
> install a desktop entry |
| 21 |
> * Somebody needs to write patches for the other WM's: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> We should focus on adding support to the following WM's first: |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> * xfce, blackblox / fluxbox / openbox / waimea / kahakai, icewm |
| 26 |
> * fvwm, windowmaker, enlightment, afterstep |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> The following are not so important, but support some kind of applications |
| 29 |
> menu: |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> * aewm / aewm++ / evilwm / windowlab / oroborus, amiwm, ctwm, flwm |
| 32 |
> * golem, larswm, pekwm, plwm, pwm, qvwm, selectwm, treewm, trwm |
| 33 |
> * vtwm, xpde |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> mfg, heinrich |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives