1 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
>> |
3 |
>> > * Overlays |
4 |
>> Not an issue: Exactly the information of that ebuild |
5 |
>> which *would* be used if you reemerge contains |
6 |
>> the relevant data. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The association between an installed package and "the ebuild it came |
9 |
> from" doesn't work correctly when overlays around. |
10 |
|
11 |
It doesn't have to: That ebuild which would be installed |
12 |
*has* to carry the up-to-date information for that package. |
13 |
Otherwise, the overlay is broken. An overlay is *not* a |
14 |
different slot for a package. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Again, you don't understand the issue. |
17 |
|
18 |
So, that's it. This was my last reply to your trolling. |
19 |
|
20 |
I hope the remaining developers will be smart enough |
21 |
to not let you destroy the distribution again. |
22 |
|
23 |
EOD with you. |