| 1 |
Hey mjo, sorry about this - we were somewhat aggressive when building |
| 2 |
this list because much of the ecosystem has a tendency to do things like |
| 3 |
put strict upper bounds in their cabal files, leading to lots of |
| 4 |
blockers and manual patching whenever dependencies get bumped. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Do any of your packages pull in deps that are in the last-rited list? |
| 7 |
If not I don't see an issue with keeping them. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
(CC hololeap & solpeth) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-------- Original Message -------- |
| 12 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: various more revdep-less Haskell |
| 13 |
packages |
| 14 |
Date: 2022-08-21 10:37 |
| 15 |
From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |
| 16 |
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
On Sun, 2022-08-21 at 03:23 +0100, Sam James wrote: |
| 19 |
> # hololeap <hololeap@××××××××××.com> (2022-08-21) |
| 20 |
> # Monolithic mask for dev-haskell/* packages which have no reverse |
| 21 |
> dependencies, |
| 22 |
> # are broken, or severely out of date.... |
| 23 |
> net-mail/list-remote-forwards |
| 24 |
> net-mail/mailbox-count |
| 25 |
> net-misc/haeredes |
| 26 |
> net-misc/hath |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Two of these have haskell@ as a backup maintainer, but the other two |
| 30 |
list only myself. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
What's wrong with them? They're essentially feature complete with no |
| 33 |
bugs and don't bother anyone AFAIK. |
Archives