Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | michael@××××××××.com | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
| Date: | Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:50:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=VnCVyYrhRXriR=H6vVwZ4N_5+RzM3DboMWOqJyAt3uA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Yes, it isn't but such kind of work flow was presented in the message I |
| 3 | > replied to. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Yup, I wasn't aware that when rebasing you have the option to squash |
| 6 | commits or not. They all get rewritten as if they were applied to the |
| 7 | current head in the first place, but apparently unless you squash them |
| 8 | you still get all the individual commits. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Rich |