1 |
On 08/31/2012 04:07 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:03:25 -0700 |
3 |
> Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> runtime-switchable USE flags for optional dependencies o.O? It |
5 |
>>> sounds like using a spoon to eat spaghetti to me. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> All suggested deps are not equal, so USE flags give you the ability to |
8 |
>> pick and choose the ones that you want. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> So does --take / --ignore with suggested dependencies, with the added |
11 |
> advantage that suggested packages don't end up being brought in without |
12 |
> user request just because a user has a particular use flag enabled |
13 |
> globally. |
14 |
|
15 |
If the USE flags have ambiguous meanings doesn't that mean that they've |
16 |
been poorly named? |
17 |
-- |
18 |
Thanks, |
19 |
Zac |