| 1 |
foser <foser@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > cccc-3.1.4 now in portage |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Why did you add that, without adding metadata ? That is just wrong. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It is better to remove it if there is no maintainer, you upping it |
| 8 |
> without adding yourself as maintainer is no form of maintenance. This is |
| 9 |
> exactly why we get complaints about a stale tree. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I still say it should be removed in 30 days. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I agree. There is a lot of stuff that suffers from being unmaintained, |
| 14 |
and I think we should strive towards cleaning that up. It helps no one |
| 15 |
if there isn't anyone to claim responsibility for the package when there |
| 16 |
is a problem. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Just my 2 cents, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) |
| 22 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 23 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 24 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
| 25 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives