| 1 |
On 6/30/20 1:28 AM, Max Magorsch wrote: |
| 2 |
> 1. Would you prefer this information to be displayed in packages.g.o |
| 3 |
> using a 'developer mode' or would you prefer a separate application |
| 4 |
> similar to the idea of project Grumpy? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'd prefer not to scatter tools around anymore. 'Developer' mode sounds |
| 7 |
better from these two options, but as you already know, I'd prefer |
| 8 |
showing relevant CI checks for users as well. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 3. What else would you like to see here? For instance, I could think |
| 13 |
> of a configurable dashboard that shows all pkgcheck warnings, new |
| 14 |
> versions and open pull requests for packages that a developer |
| 15 |
> maintains. Would that be useful? What else could you think of? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm happy with what you've come up. Can we change the defaults from |
| 18 |
pkgcheck though? I don't think these 'UnstableOnly' or 'PotentialStable' |
| 19 |
benefit anyone since they cause a lot of noise, and checking |
| 20 |
PotentialStable still requires a lot of maintainer attention. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'd like to see them be replaced with 'StableRequestCheck' and |
| 23 |
'RedundantVersionCheck' which I believe servers majority of maintainers |
| 24 |
better. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Then obviously the usual CI checks, AbsoluteSymlink, BannedEapiCommand |
| 27 |
etc what is shown here: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Showing open pull requests would be a **massive** enhancement to |
| 32 |
developer mode in my opinion. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
This is the alpha version, right? Looking good so far! Thanks for your work. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- juippis |
Archives