| 1 |
* Arun Raghavan <arunisgod@×××××.com> schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Hi, |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> We were just discussing if it makes sense to either die or issue a QA |
| 6 |
> notice if one of the do* functions fail. It turns out that there's |
| 7 |
> already a bug for this [1]. This potentially applies to all helper |
| 8 |
> functions that don't currently die on failure. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'd like to see it this way: introduce a new FEATURE (eg. "hard-qa"), |
| 11 |
which causes QA warnings to fail. Then evryone's free to enable it. |
| 12 |
Maintainers always should run their tests with hard-qa, unless there's |
| 13 |
are *really* good reason. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
IMHO, this wouldn't harm any users who don't insist in it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
cu |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 21 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 22 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 23 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 24 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 25 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 26 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 27 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives