| 1 |
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> It isn't like security project adds any additional load to any arch |
| 5 |
>> team, an architecture capable to keep up with normal keyword and |
| 6 |
>> stabilization requests should also be able to keep up with security. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> What about arches that use stable keywords only on a core set of |
| 9 |
> system packages to indicate that they're usable, so that they can have |
| 10 |
> a stage3 that actually boots? I'm not sure they even keep up with |
| 11 |
> security in this case. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yes, this is the right thing to do. |
Archives