Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Collins Richey <crichey@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed patch
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:09:18
Message-Id: e00942e405022206096167aa4b@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed patch by Drake Wyrm
1 On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 03:55:06 -0800, Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > This is actually an excellent illustration of my point. The patch I
4 > mentioned as an example changes almost nothing. It adds one file and
5 > touches the makefiles so that the build process notices it. Its
6 > inclusion would be completely benign.
7 >
8
9 Sit back in your chair and think about that at least twice! I've been
10 working in the computer industry for 30+ years, and I can't even begin
11 to count the times when a total outage was followed by the excuse "But
12 I just changed one line!".
13
14 --
15 Collins
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list