| 1 |
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:19:19 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:54:21 -0400 |
| 5 |
> Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > For libraries, if possible, try splitting gtk2 and gtk3 support into |
| 7 |
> > different slots (see net-libs/webkit-gtk for an example; the |
| 8 |
> > gtk2-based versions have -r2xx revision numbers and go in slot 2, |
| 9 |
> > while the gtk3-based versions have -r3xx revision numbers and go in |
| 10 |
> > slot 3). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> That is not what revisions are for. If you can't solve a problem |
| 13 |
> properly using existing mechanisms, ask for new ones. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Indeed. But reusing revisions is probably saner than abusing |
| 16 |
the version number to achieve the same goal. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Michał Górny |
Archives