| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:35:44PM +0200, Jonathan Fors wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello |
| 3 |
> I have begun hacking on the glsa-check script today, and I came up with |
| 4 |
> serious improvements and hacks that seem useful. |
| 5 |
> However, before I send a patch, should I base my work on the source |
| 6 |
> distfile or the CVS? The version of gentoolkit that I have currently |
| 7 |
> improved upon is gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8. |
| 8 |
> Sorry if this question may seem ignorant, but this is the first time I |
| 9 |
> am ever contributing to a project. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For the maintainer, it's easiest if you supply a patch against CVS, since that |
| 12 |
results in the least amount of hassle when applying the patch. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Sometimes you have to take into account CVS branching, but we don't do that |
| 15 |
for gentoolkit, so there's not a problem there. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- Karl T |
Archives