Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing SHA512 hash from Manifests | ||
| Date: | Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:24:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | ur1fma03d@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing SHA512 hash from Manifests by Roy Bamford |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I'm in the "if it's not broken don't fix it" school. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | +1 |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I don't see a strong argument to remove SHA512, so leave things as they |
| 8 | are for now. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | We can reiterate when there are indications that SHA512 would be broken. |
| 11 | (Then again, the same applies to BLAKE2B.) |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Ulrich |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing SHA512 hash from Manifests | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |