From: | R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS | ||
Date: | Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:41:55 | ||
Message-Id: | e1n5i6$vmc$1@sea.gmane.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS by Donnie Berkholz |
1 | Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 | > R Hill wrote: |
3 | >> There's an endless number of CFLAGS that could be warned about, and just |
4 | >> as many situations where they're actually useful. Aside, I've yet to |
5 | >> hear of _anything_ that's broken because of -fvisibility-inlines-hidden. |
6 | >> (course someone will undoubtedly point one out now ;)) |
7 | > |
8 | > How about kde? |
9 | |
10 | Close, that's -fvisibility=hidden. :) |
11 | |
12 | http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html#visibility |
13 | |
14 | --de. |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: automatically killing invalid CFLAGS/warning about bad CFLAGS | "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o> |