Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:45:51
Message-Id: 20090327014508.45d47afa@terra.solaris
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch) by "René 'Necoro' Neumann"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi,
5
6 René 'Necoro' Neumann <lists@××××××.eu>:
7 > So I'd vote for switching back to using normal checkouts (or branches
8 > - they don't really differ in bzr for that matter).
9
10 My tests with Bazaar 1.13.1 show roughly the same time with and
11 without --lightweight. Although I am not sure what you mean by
12 export vs. fetch.
13
14 V-Li
15
16 - --
17 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
18 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
19
20 <URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>
21 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
22 Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
23
24 iEYEARECAAYFAknMIZ0ACgkQNQqtfCuFneM4EgCfRTbiuECtMkkxqwTr99S8R8l/
25 8cIAnRLu7wT+OdmP8mp6ZdUHCT+x70G5
26 =7TM4
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch) "René 'Necoro' Neumann" <lists@××××××.eu>