Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [v3] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:42:58
Message-Id: 1215002584.4835.0.camel@woix.comwax.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [v3] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Le mercredi 02 juillet 2008 à 00:30 +0000, Duncan a écrit :
2 > Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o> posted 20080701112956.143dbd22@vrm378-02,
3 > excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
4 >
5 > > Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote:
6 > > That said, I have no idea how many duplicate / incomplete bugs I have
7 > > never seen due to the wonderful work of the wranglers. In some ways it
8 > > would be a shame to lose that quality pre-reading of the bugs.
9 >
10 > Perhaps the best solution is to get the implementation in place, but not
11 > completely automate it. Put the tools there so if it looks right, all
12 > the wrangler needs to do is a single click, and it's auto-assigned, but
13 > that single click is still necessary so that a human actually gets to
14 > review things before doing the assignment.
15 >
16 > That would make it /much/ easier for the wranglers.
17 >
18 > If desired, a cron script or some such could then be setup to go thru and
19 > automatically assign anything that wasn't assigned yet and that hadn't
20 > been touched (no comments asking for more info, etc) for some period, say
21 > a week, just to catch anything that fell thru the cracks or if the
22 > wranglers all disappeared or went on strike/vacation/whatever. Then if
23 > folks ever suddenly find themselves inundated with "raw" bugs, it'd be a
24 > serious indication that the wranglers needed some help.
25
26 sounds like a plan
27 --
28 Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
29 Gentoo

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature