1 |
Le mercredi 02 juillet 2008 à 00:30 +0000, Duncan a écrit : |
2 |
> Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o> posted 20080701112956.143dbd22@vrm378-02, |
3 |
> excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > That said, I have no idea how many duplicate / incomplete bugs I have |
7 |
> > never seen due to the wonderful work of the wranglers. In some ways it |
8 |
> > would be a shame to lose that quality pre-reading of the bugs. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Perhaps the best solution is to get the implementation in place, but not |
11 |
> completely automate it. Put the tools there so if it looks right, all |
12 |
> the wrangler needs to do is a single click, and it's auto-assigned, but |
13 |
> that single click is still necessary so that a human actually gets to |
14 |
> review things before doing the assignment. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> That would make it /much/ easier for the wranglers. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> If desired, a cron script or some such could then be setup to go thru and |
19 |
> automatically assign anything that wasn't assigned yet and that hadn't |
20 |
> been touched (no comments asking for more info, etc) for some period, say |
21 |
> a week, just to catch anything that fell thru the cracks or if the |
22 |
> wranglers all disappeared or went on strike/vacation/whatever. Then if |
23 |
> folks ever suddenly find themselves inundated with "raw" bugs, it'd be a |
24 |
> serious indication that the wranglers needed some help. |
25 |
|
26 |
sounds like a plan |
27 |
-- |
28 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
29 |
Gentoo |