Archives
Archives
| From: | Torsten Veller <tove@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date | ||
| Date: | Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:28:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20111123152036.TA0db695.tv@veller.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date by "Paweł Hajdan | ||
| 1 | * "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@g.o>: |
| 2 | > Please review the list, it's 800+ packages so I thought about asking for |
| 3 | > feedback before filing stabilization bugs (I plan to do that in stages |
| 4 | > of course). |
| 5 | |
| 6 | What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I don't know if any of the packages is really good to be stabilized. |
| 9 | Maybe they are better than the current stable version, maybe not. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Regards Torsten |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date | "Paweł Hajdan |