1 |
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:55:08 +0100 |
2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:35:21 +0200 |
5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots |
7 |
> > in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, |
8 |
> > quse and euse as well. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Hrm, it's rather disappointing that they're accepted everywhere. That |
11 |
> really shouldn't happen... My excuse for Paludis is that I never quite |
12 |
> got around to passing in additional flags to validation of names, and |
13 |
> dots are legal in exheres-0, so they're currently accepted everywhere. |
14 |
|
15 |
And may I remind you that lately you deliberately changed PMS for all |
16 |
EAPIs to satisfy invalid paludis behavior? And you knew that it caused |
17 |
actual breakages. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
Michał Górny |