| 1 |
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:32:45AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 29 May 2005 01:48 am, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The actual fix to the bug is a minor one, a small check to Repoman to |
| 4 |
> > make sure ebuilds have both DEPEND and RDEPEND set; and to warn if they |
| 5 |
> > are not set. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > However the use of DEPEND and RDEPEND in the manner that they are |
| 8 |
> > requesting is a large change and thus was brought here for discussion. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> i'm against this ... the current behavior is the logical default imho |
| 11 |
What of eclasses? Bug 58819 comes to mind... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Ebuilds get the RDEPEND="${REPEND-${DEPEND}}" default, but |
| 14 |
eclasses don't. Would rather there was a standard the whole way |
| 15 |
through personally, even if eclasses are a bit more complex |
| 16 |
in enforcing the RDEPEND="${RDEPEND-${DEPEND}}" behaviour. That |
| 17 |
said, I'm not much for the auto-setting of RDEPEND :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
So... extend the ebuild behaviour to eclasses, or... |
| 20 |
~harring |
Archives