| 1 |
On 08/01/2011 02:32 PM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu 01.08.2011 13:12, Marc Schiffbauer pisze: |
| 3 |
>> * Samuli Suominen schrieb am 01.08.11 um 09:23 Uhr: |
| 4 |
>>> On 07/31/2011 05:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:55:23 +0300 |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
[ .. ] |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I am a zeleous follower of having seperate /usr partition, thus seeing |
| 10 |
> moot arguments that goes "in favour" of "my" case is pretty annoying. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
need to have a verifiable reason in order to block a feature that would |
| 13 |
add, not remove, functionality. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
trying to find an right answer to wrong question, and preventing "what |
| 16 |
could be progress" for selfish reasons can be annoying too. that is, in |
| 17 |
addition to the hatemail with no actual point in them. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
>> * Some people want a read-only /usr |
| 20 |
> Yes, that's only reasonable argument here. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
see $subject, " ... without proper initramfs" |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
using a separate /usr would still be possible read-only, with an |
| 25 |
initramfs created by dracut |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Cheers, |
| 29 |
> Kacper |
| 30 |
> |
Archives