| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 19:12 +0100, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Does this mean that we can get rid of the libstd++ dependency of gcc, |
| 5 |
> and move it to the binary packages that depends on gcc 3.3 . |
| 6 |
> I know this has been discussed before, but once it's stable I see no |
| 7 |
> reason to keep the dependency in the gcc ebuild, when it could be in the |
| 8 |
> binary packages. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Well, right after the upgrade, there will still be tons of non-binary |
| 12 |
programs built against the old libstdc++, so no. Unless you want to |
| 13 |
force everyone to emerge -e world after the upgrade (which will make you |
| 14 |
very unpopular). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Daniel |
Archives