| 1 |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:19:29 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> The ~arch version of portage hs a new QA check that reports installation |
| 5 |
> of files outside of directories that have been whitelisted [1]. The |
| 6 |
> current whitelist includes: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> directories common to / and /usr |
| 9 |
> ================================ |
| 10 |
> bin lib lib32 lib64 libx32 sbin |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> top level directories |
| 13 |
> ================================ |
| 14 |
> boot dev etc opt srv usr var |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> /usr level directories |
| 17 |
> ================================ |
| 18 |
> include libexec share src |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> /usr/share/doc level directories |
| 21 |
> ================================ |
| 22 |
> /usr/share/doc/${PF} |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> The first bug report [2] is for qt-core, which installs documentation |
| 25 |
> into /usr/share/doc/${PN}-${PV} instead of /usr/share/doc/${PF} (${PF} |
| 26 |
> includes ebuild revision such as -r1, -r2, and so on). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Sometimes documentation contains files used at run-time by the |
| 29 |
application. Since application is usually not aware of Gentoo |
| 30 |
specific revision numbers it is reasonable to install docs in |
| 31 |
${PN}-${PV}. Such checks *must* be overrideable. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Best regards, |
| 34 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives