1 |
On 12/22/2012 01:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> On 22 December 2012 09:26, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Hello |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> After seeing: |
6 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440214 |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Looking to a lot of its blockers shows that we are using "elog" messages |
9 |
>> for informing people about configuration (like pointing people to |
10 |
>> external links to get proper way of configuring things, tell them to add |
11 |
>> to some system groups...). I thought that maybe this kind of information |
12 |
>> could be simply included in a canonical file under /usr/share/doc/ |
13 |
>> package dir called, for example, CONFIGURATION or SETUP. We would them |
14 |
>> point people (now with a news item, for the long term provably a note to |
15 |
>> handbook to newcomers would be nice) to that file to configure their |
16 |
>> setups. The main advantages I see: |
17 |
>> - We will flood less summary.log ;) |
18 |
>> - The information to configure the package is always present while |
19 |
>> package is installed, now, if we remove merge produced logs, people will |
20 |
>> need to reemerge the package or read directly the ebuild |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> What do you think? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Correct me if I am wrong but are you suggesting we drop the elog |
25 |
> messages altogether? I still believe that having the elog messages |
26 |
> at the end of an 'emerge -uDN world' is more convenient. Maybe it |
27 |
> makes sense to have both, as in print the elog messages and |
28 |
> create those CONFIGURATION or SETUP files at the same time. |
29 |
|
30 |
As a compromise, you could have the ebuild trigger the elog message only |
31 |
when there is not a previous version of the package installed. |
32 |
-- |
33 |
Thanks, |
34 |
Zac |