1 |
Hi again, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 15:11, foser wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Gentoo is suffering from the 'secret conversations' urban myth. |
6 |
|
7 |
This is the way communication was handled, don't blame anyone else for |
8 |
it. |
9 |
|
10 |
> The lack of visibility is the lack of organization and the pretty much |
11 |
> total freedom developers had, there was no real need to communicate on |
12 |
> certain points because it worked as it was. While this had its merits |
13 |
> and made Gentoo in what it is today i see more and more that this isn't |
14 |
> sufficient anymore (i come from a time when it was possible). This is |
15 |
> what the proposed top-level structure intends to tackle. |
16 |
|
17 |
Agreed, we need a changing structure and the draft master plan looks |
18 |
very good in respect of that. |
19 |
|
20 |
> There is not much to say. I can tell you there's nothing special in area |
21 |
> 51, but if you want to believe it won't change your mind. |
22 |
|
23 |
Ok, i do believe you, so where is this GFDL link and reference which |
24 |
should be applied to docs* ? |
25 |
|
26 |
Steph |
27 |
|
28 |
> PS III. This mail goes as far as Gentoo Linux development, business |
29 |
> ventures etc. have a certain secrecy over them which i don't find |
30 |
> particular appropriate either. But to a certain degree that is not |
31 |
> directly related to the distro as a whole. |
32 |
|
33 |
I used to work for 'OpenSource' companies which were doing business with |
34 |
opensource software and developers, nothing against it so far except |
35 |
they didn't quite play by the rules after a while. I'm not implying that |
36 |
is what Gentoo does because i don't know ... |
37 |
|
38 |
Steph |
39 |
-- |
40 |
Mail sent on Gentoo 1.4rc3 k2421 AMD 2600+ |
41 |
http://frlinux.net - frlinux@×××××××.net |
42 |
http://gentoofr.org - Portail Francais sur Gentoo Linux |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |