Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] splashutils needs a maintainer
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:19:58
Message-Id: 1359832788.26423.58.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] splashutils needs a maintainer by Sergey Popov
1 El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 15:55 +0400, Sergey Popov escribió:
2 > 28.01.2013 23:26, Pacho Ramos пишет:
3 > > Then, looks like no alternative is in good shape on Gentoo. What is
4 > > Sabayon using? They look to have plymouth ebuilds in their overlay (but
5 > > not in "for-gentoo" one, then, it probably has some incompatibility
6 > > Gentoo :/)
7 >
8 > We have plymouth ebuilds in tree, but they are outdated(see
9 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430478).
10 >
11
12 Could anyone summarize the advantages of splashutils over plymouth? As
13 both look to be needed of some love in Gentoo, maybe would be better to
14 focus on later one (that is the preferred option in most distributions
15 and is actively developed)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] splashutils needs a maintainer "Dustin C. Hatch" <admiralnemo@×××××.com>