Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files...
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:50:45
Message-Id: 485A0FF3.9070509@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files... by Alexis Ballier
1 Alexis Ballier wrote:
2 > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:18:19 +0200
3 > flameeyes@×××××.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
4 >
5 >> libogg and popt are now masked, and they'll wait a bit before return
6 >> to ~arch that way.
7 >
8 > 2 months later, any news on this ? I've been using the unmasked
9 > versions so long; are we going to wait forever ? It's probably better
10 > to unmask it or revert the change at this point.
11
12 We could either pick a week and do a major ebuild update to remove .la
13 files when unnecessary or just append a notice about revdep rebuild.
14
15 lu
16
17 --
18
19 Luca Barbato
20 Gentoo Council Member
21 Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
22 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files... David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>