| 1 |
Dan Armak <ermak@×××××××××××××.il> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> An idea: building a lyx-base ebuild which only depends on x11/gtk |
| 4 |
> and a lyx ebuild which does nothing but depends on lyx-bsae, tetex |
| 5 |
> and everything else. Maybe with another in-between stage (i.e. a |
| 6 |
> lyx-utils ebuild). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
this is generally what I prefer. something like "lyx" does |
| 9 |
everything, if you want specifics, then you do "lyx-base", |
| 10 |
"lyx-viewers", "lyx-output", "lyx-util-<foo>", lyx-util-<bar>" etc. |
| 11 |
is there any easy way of making a ebuild depend on "lyx-*"? :-) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> What do you think? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think you're doing a great job tossing ebuilds at us. ,-) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Another issue: whould Lyx go into app-text (as a latex frontend) or into |
| 18 |
> app-office (as a word processor)? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
gaaah. app-office IMHO. it has enough WYSIWYG-ideas for it to be |
| 21 |
classifiable as a word processor. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> And finally: does anybody here except myself use LyX? Because I |
| 24 |
> can't understand how such a great distro cold live so long without |
| 25 |
> this all-important package. :-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
emacs, tex-mode, latex. I've never had the use for LyX. ;-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Terje |
Archives