Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 20:07:41
Message-Id: 463CE2FC.3000500@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
2 > On Sat, 5 May 2007 21:18:38 +0200
3 > Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> wrote:
4 >> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:46:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 >>> It warns noisily.
6 >> Then it's not even close to being broken and i don't see the need for
7 >> a news item.
8 >
9 > You don't use Paludis. Paludis users do see the need for a news item.
10 >
11
12 Well, then frankly feed those news to your overlay users; we don't need
13 such stuff abused in gentoo-x86 because paludis users are unable
14 (according to your claims) read explicit runtime deprecation warnings.
15
16 Because the above is clearly stupid - what are you really after here,
17 may I ask? I guess amne is right here.
18
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22
23 Jakub Moc
24 mailto:jakub@g.o
25 GPG signature:
26 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
27 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
28
29 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>