Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:57:58
Message-Id: 1315582735.19414.4.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options by Alexis Ballier
1 El vie, 09-09-2011 a las 12:23 -0300, Alexis Ballier escribió:
2 > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:14:41 +0200
3 > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
4 > >
5 > > Well, in this case it is simply appending "-g" when building with
6 > > debugging support, and it doesn't seem to cause any problem :-/
7 >
8 > -g shouldnt change anything since binaries are stripped afterwards; if
9 > the useflag only adds -g then you should drop it imho; if it adds e.g.
10 > some asserts & stuff like that, imho its sane to let the useflag add a
11 > harmless -g
12 >
13 > A.
14 >
15 >
16
17 Looks like it's only adding "-g" and then it could be simply dropped...
18
19 Thanks a lot :)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature