Archives
Archives
| From: | "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <gentoo@×××.name> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree | ||
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2018 21:48:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1688463.3MHef0ArYk@tp | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree by Richard Yao |
||
| 1 | > I guess /var/portage is not a terrible choice. |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Well, I double that. |
| 4 | I've already use the following structure: |
| 5 | |- /var/portage/ |
| 6 | | |- repos |
| 7 | | | |- gentoo |
| 8 | | | |- reponame1 |
| 9 | | | |- reponame2 |
| 10 | | |- distfiles |
| 11 | | | |- ... |
| 12 | | | |- ... |
| 13 | | |- packages |
| 14 | | | |- ... |
| 15 | | | |- ... |
| 16 | | |- meta |
| 17 | | |- layman |
| 18 | | |- ... # (used to be used for layman stuff until eselect-repository) |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | And I think it's pretty fine and usefull, especially because distfiles/ |
| 22 | packages does not belong to one specific repo (gentoo) as it does with /usr/ |
| 23 | portage. |