Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:21:38
Message-Id: 519B66BF.4090304@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs by "Paweł Hajdan
1 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." schrieb:
2 > Remember this is supposed to _help_ Gentoo. You can opt out of the bugs
3 > (there is a package name and maintainer name regex in the script). You
4 > don't need to "hunt them down" - if you do nothing another script will
5 > just CC arches after 30 days.
6 >
7 > Paweł
8 >
9
10 Uhm, automagic stabilization without maintainer ok? This sounds like a
11 bad idea.
12
13 Doing a batch CC-ing after maintainer gave his ok or anything similar,
14 which starts, when someone actually aproved the stable going is all ok,
15 but doing this automaticly may get packages become stable, which are not
16 intended to become so and should have never been there.
17
18 --
19
20 Thomas Sachau
21 Gentoo Linux Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>