Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | licenses <licenses@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing | ||
| Date: | Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:57:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | eedf0ec558a9f0eed33a6fa68f69b5f281c76c09.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 14:26 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 | > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 3 | > > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 | > > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having |
| 5 | > > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's |
| 6 | > > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. |
| 7 | > > |
| 8 | > > This has been discussed before. There is no such license as GPL-2-only. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > I am with ulm on this one. |
| 11 | > We have GPL-2 and GPL-2+ in the tree. The way I read this, |
| 12 | > LICENSE="GPL-2" means GPL 2 only and LICENSE="GPL-2+" means GPL-2+. |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Have you read my original mail? |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Best regards, |
| 19 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |