Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sam James <sam@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] No stable firejail
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 01:48:22
Message-Id: 236A82D4-54DB-4C1B-B4E4-511641D3B3FB@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] No stable firejail by Oskari Pirhonen
1 > On 21 Feb 2022, at 00:49, Oskari Pirhonen <xxc3ncoredxx@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > Hi,
4 >
5 > After updating my system and running `eclean-dist --deep`, I noticed the
6 > following output:
7 >
8 > The following unavailable installed packages were found
9 > sys-apps/firejail-0.9.64.4
10 >
11 > Was removing the stable version of sys-apps/firejail intentional? The
12 > ebuild commit message says "Upstream released security bump", so it
13 > sounds plausible.
14 >
15 > I'm OK with manually keywording `=sys-apps/firejail-0.9.68`, but I
16 > generally prefer stable packages where I can. Also, I find it
17 > interesting that a package that previously had a stable version no
18 > longer does. I've used Gentoo since ~2016, and off the top of my head, I
19 > can't think of another instance of something like this occurring (with
20 > the set of packages I have installed).
21 >
22
23 Just a mistake. Probably better for bugs.gentoo.org. Fixed, thanks.
24
25 Best,
26 sam

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature