1 |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 08:25:20PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Let's split this from [1] as I suppose having it in middle of high-noise |
5 |
> 'up for grabs' might prevent some interested people from seeing it. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The general purpose of codec project [2] is to maintain core libraries |
8 |
> for various multimedia format encoder/decoder libraries. It's like |
9 |
> gfx+sound+video except only for core packages and not every possible |
10 |
> single viewer, player, editor, frontend... I believe that this specific |
11 |
> focus make more sense than the wider projects, i.e. it is more likely |
12 |
> than N people will actually co-maintain libraries used by many tools vs |
13 |
> N people co-maintain 20 alternative sound players (when they are |
14 |
> unlikely to use more than one at a time). |
15 |
> |
16 |
> The main questions are: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> 1. Should the project be focused on reference/most common |
19 |
> implementations, or maybe more of them? Say, giflib vs libnsgif. |
20 |
> I think the latter library is specific to a few programs right now but |
21 |
> if it gets more popular, it would fit. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
I am not really sure that we *need* a project. I have seen many devs |
25 |
takeover several packages... of those individuals, they are active and I |
26 |
don't believe they would complain if others touched former @graphics |
27 |
packages. |
28 |
|
29 |
> 3. What about libraries implementing media-specific streaming protocols? |
30 |
|
31 |
As stated above, I am not sure we need a project to maintain these. Of |
32 |
course, it *would* be nice. Attempting to define something out of such |
33 |
disparity seems frivolous, but I understand the intention. |
34 |
|
35 |
Additionally, I am not advocating for the disbandment of all projects, |
36 |
but simply those that lack impact. It was more an effort to show that |
37 |
*most* individuals in said project were slacking, but would complain |
38 |
when others attempted to assist. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Cheers, |
42 |
Aaron |