From: | Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=/etc/env.d | ||
Date: | Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:51:07 | ||
Message-Id: | 20070305000059.0ef389fc@maya | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=/etc/env.d by Stephen Bennett |
1 | No response means no objections means in it goes. |
2 | |
3 | On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:07:47 +0000 |
4 | Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> wrote: |
5 | |
6 | > Can't remember whether I already mailed about this, but better safe |
7 | > than sorry. Currently /etc/env.d is added to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK in |
8 | > make.globals, and as far as i can tell nowhere in profiles. Anyone |
9 | > object if I add it to base/make.defaults? |
10 | > -- |
11 | > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
12 | > |
13 | -- |
14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |