| 1 |
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:27:59 -0600 |
| 2 |
Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This is another of those issues where whichever way it's done, some |
| 4 |
> > people complain. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> As long as you go by the rules those who complain about you doing so |
| 7 |
> are wrong. I've been told you were not the kind who was afraid of |
| 8 |
> being right. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'm also not the sort of person who's going to waste hours and hours |
| 11 |
documenting answers to every nonsensical objection that people make up. |
| 12 |
Most of the objections being raised to GLEP 55 are in the "not even |
| 13 |
wrong" category -- people are claiming GLEP 55 is bad because invisible |
| 14 |
green cows are eating the moon. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> So, what do you think about my proposition ? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's pretty clear that objections and voting aren't even being based |
| 19 |
upon what the GLEP says these days, so I don't see any point. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives