Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:27:45
Message-Id: 51C4A921.1000001@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year by Sergey Popov
1 21.06.2013 23:22, Sergey Popov пишет:
2 > 2) package has dead upstream, does not build with current
3 > gcc/glibc/binutils/whatever and can not be fixed - bug is closed as
4 > OBSOLETE.
5 >
6
7 Of course i am talking about long-standing bugs, that assigned to
8 maintainer-wanted@. That's why OBSOLETE seems to be a better decision,
9 but WONTFIX is reasonable too :-)
10
11 --
12 Best regards, Sergey Popov
13 Gentoo developer
14 Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead
15 Gentoo Qt project lead

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year Alex Xu <alex_y_xu@×××××.ca>